General Rules for Evidence Assessment

“The presumption of soundness does not relate to the nexus requirement.” [Gilbert v. Shinseki, 749 F.3d 1370, 1373 (Fed.Cir. 2014)]

“While the [38 U.S.C.] section 105(a) presumption establishes that an injury or disease that was incurred during service was incurred in the line of duty, it is irrelevant to the question whether that in-service injury or disease is causally related to the veteran’s current disability.” [Holton v. Shinseki, 557 F.3d 1362, 1367 (Fed.Cir. 2009)]

Relevant Posts

BVA1455333: Causal Nexus

Citation Nr: 1455333 Decision Date: 12/16/14 Archive Date: 12/24/14 DOCKET NO. 12-14 433 FINDING OF FACT The Veteran has been diagnosed with PTSD medically linked to an established in-service [...]


We're not around right now. But you can send us an email and we'll get back to you, asap.

Not readable? Change text. captcha txt

Start typing and press Enter to search